Developing U.S.-ROK-ASEAN Cooperation

Developing U.S.-ROK-ASEAN Cooperation

South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha links hands with ASEAN foreign ministers and their representatives at the ASEAN-Republic of Korea Ministerial Meeting in Pasay city, metro Manila, the Philippines, on August 6, 2017. Noel Celis/Reuters

South Korea stands out as an ideal non-ASEAN Asian power that has the potential to work with both the United States and ASEAN to foster greater regional cooperation in Southeast Asia.

January 2018

South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha links hands with ASEAN foreign ministers and their representatives at the ASEAN-Republic of Korea Ministerial Meeting in Pasay city, metro Manila, the Philippines, on August 6, 2017. Noel Celis/Reuters
Report

Overview

Since its establishment in 1967, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has fostered unprecedented levels of regional economic, political, and security cooperation. While disputes and contradictions still exist among the nations, ASEAN has helped to prevent bilateral differences from turning into major conflicts.

Yet despite these accomplishments, effective regionalism in Southeast Asia faces constraints. ASEAN cannot resolve chronic maritime territorial claims or avoid the influence of competition among major powers outside the region. The organization seeks the power to set norms for cooperation in the region (such as the ASEAN Free-Trade Area or Code of Conduct for the South China Sea with China), but it is still vulnerable on issues that involve great powers. The process of regional integration is limited by the emphasis on economic cooperation rather than on forming effective mechanisms to resolve crisis spots such as the South China Sea. Collaboration is based primarily on building confidence (by creating norms and opportunities for dialogue and expanding shared interests) rather than on developing security ties.

More on:

South Korea

Southeast Asia

United States

Diplomacy and International Institutions

International Organizations

To solidify itself as a regional security bloc capable of addressing crises, ASEAN should develop greater security cooperation with outside nations, including the United States, Australia, China, India, Japan, Russia, and South Korea. Presently, cooperation among nations within and outside the region is not strong enough to address the fundamental causes of territorial disputes or major financial or economic crises that endanger the region’s development.

In particular, South Korea stands out as an ideal non-ASEAN Asian power that has the potential to work with both the United States and ASEAN to foster greater regional cooperation in Southeast Asia. Japan, while a major U.S. ally and economy, has geopolitical, historical, and territorial disputes with China and would have difficulty adding to regional cooperation. By taking advantage of South Korea’s increasing diplomatic and economic capacity, the United States should seek to improve state of U.S.-ROK-ASEAN relations to promote regional security and stability in Southeast Asia.

More on:

South Korea

Southeast Asia

United States

Diplomacy and International Institutions

International Organizations

Top Stories on CFR

Russia

Liana Fix, a fellow for Europe at CFR, and Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at CFR, sit down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the future of U.S. policy toward Russia and the risks posed by heightened tensions between two nuclear powers. This episode is the first in a special TPI series on the U.S. 2024 presidential election and is supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Terrorism and Counterterrorism

Violence around U.S. elections in 2024 could not only destabilize American democracy but also embolden autocrats across the world. Jacob Ware recommends that political leaders take steps to shore up civic trust and remove the opportunity for violence ahead of the 2024 election season.

China

Those seeking to profit from fentanyl and governments seeking to control its supply are locked in a never-ending competition, with each new countermeasure spurring further innovation to circumvent it.